Never before in recent months the international press has discussed, argued and speculated on the particular history of our country. The talking points for Italy have been many: the external (May 12 '09) Veronica Lario after the case 'was a minor' Letizia, the reference to the episode Ballarò (September 15) in favor of a special holder -Door (opening of houses for 300 displaced persons Onna 65 thousand), as well as the spicy revelations of D'Addario (prostitute addicted to register, paid for the pleasure of the Premier by his friend in common with D'Alema, this Tarantini ), the break-Berlusconi CEI (Boffo case), the rupture Bossi-Berlusconi-Fini, the international embarrassment about our involvement with the terrorist Abdelbaset al Megrahi (Lockerbie convicted for the massacre) at the banquet organized by Gaddafi in Libya for the celebration of its 40th 'mandate', the bickering of the Premier Barroso (since re-elected President of the European Commission until 2014), the reckless accusations in the Republic (as well as the Unity and El Pais), the debate about freedom of information and the subsequent appeal to every form of attack on the media launched by the three jurists Franco Cordero, Stefano Rodota, Gustavo Zagrebelsky by La Repubblica.
Separately, some warm and concise statement on issues referred to above the increasingly inept and moribund opposition, almost all the newspapers (and TV), until a few weeks ago, have more or less silent, as well as on those events, even on what you think of us as well national boundaries. Only one newspaper has denounced what was happening and reported the international news media: The Republic of the De Benedetti Group. That Group, for heading the owner Carlo De Benedetti, has denied being a 'leftist', as the Premier has accused in recent months, although Charles had participated in the 2002 meeting to launch the association 'Freedom & ; Justice '(libertaegiustizia.it) along with much of the middle class, intellectuals and industrialists of the left (the La7 journalist Gad Lerner, Umberto Eco, Enzo Biagi, a lawyer Franzo Grande Stevens of the Agnelli clan, the financier and former DS Guido Rossi, Professor Umberto Veronesi, the constitutional Galante Garrone, former president of RAI and the editor of Il Sole 24 Ore, the former director general of Confindustria Innocent Cipolletta). It might seem like a coincidence, but the analogy with 'Justice & Freedom' (the political movement founded in Paris in 1929 by a group of exiled anti-Fascist leader among which Carlo Rosselli, a theorist of 'liberal socialism') seems far a case. However, Freedom & Justice (read on the site) 'is not a political party' but aims to bring people to parties and aims to 'get them going' and then, in a sense, is like saying that it intends to communicate not only with those of center, but also with those of the center. This can be understood by scrolling the signatures gathered by the Republic to support the appeal by the trio of law-Cordero Rodotà-Zagrebelsky Freedom of Information (reached over 400 thousand signatures so far): apart from the few members of the Italian left a bit 'pimps (Dario Franceschini, Giovanna Melandri, Matteo Colaninno) and in some cases now out of it (Fausto Bertinotti, Sergio Cofferati) no other politician of the Democratic Party has responded to the call of the three lawyers. Continuing to read between the signatures we see that as well as esteemed personality of the show and the Italian and international culture (so far with 7 Nobel Laureates), also 16 heads of major international newspapers are displayed directly supporting the appeal with their signature. Of these, only two signatures are directors who work in the center-right newspapers (the Financial Times and Murdoch's Times). The rest of the signatures are: 3-of-center newspapers (Le Soir, El Pais, The Indipendnt), 3-of-center liberal newspapers (The Guardian, Die Zeit, Le Nouvel Observateur), two liberal newspapers (the Novaya Gazeta and Russian Ogoniok of which we remember the journalist Anna Politkovskaya assiduous opponent of Putin and killed 'mysteriously'), a Social Democratic newspaper (Periodico de Catalunya), a liberal newspaper (Süddeutsche Zeitung), a social-liberal newspaper (Gazeta Wyborcza) and Finally, a left-wing newspaper (Liberation). The last signing out from the crowd of media, the organization Reporters Sans Frontieres that independent renew our estimate. In essence, most of the political support comes from the wing liberal center-left. On the other hand, the blows from the foreign press to this government - in the person of Silvio Berlusconi - have been unleashed to watch mostly text on the right (even conservative) that do not reject the capitalist ideology of Anglo-American model now in crisis. Based on the fact the nationality of the newspapers and on their political orientation (source wikipedia) show that foreign articles published from mid-June to mid-September, 345 (on average 3 articles a day). Taking into account only the most important text is among these, those who have written at least two articles you reach 294 items whose geographical origin is: 45% United Kingdom (Daily Telegraph, The Guardian, The Economist, The Financial Times, The Times, The Economist, The Independent, The Observer, BBC online, etc..), 22% Spain (El Mundo Italy's RCS property, El Pais, El Comercio, La Nacion, El Periodico, ABC etc..), 11% France (Le Figaro, Le Monde, Liberation, L'Express, etc..) 7% United States (The New York Times Woshington Post, The Wall Street Journal, The Time etc..) 5% Germany (Bild, Die Sueddeutsche Zeitung, Spiegel, etc.,), 1% Australia (The Australian, The Sydney Morning Herald), 8% rest of the world. Of these 49% can be attributed to head right or center, 33% tested in the left (liberal, social democratic), 7% to newspapers of the center (the remaining 11% is not obviously political stance). In addition it is good to point out that about one-fifth of the articles (18%) comes from newspapers owned by Murdoch (The Wall Street Journal, The Sun, The Times etc.), and also owns SKY main opponent / competitor of Premier Silvio Berlusconi or better as an entrepreneur.
The above data show, therefore, a mismatch of fund that is not be underestimated for the purposes of our analysis, because about 49% of right-wing newspapers, only 2 wanted to participate in the call?
hypothesis could be that the sole purpose of certain publishing companies (and financial) is to destabilize our government and perhaps not only the current one. Republic for its part, the momentum by giving a key to more close to their own purposes, just showing a sudden interest in Italy's image abroad. Interest, just for example, was that when in 2007 the Daily Telegraph (which on current events has spent a total of 17 articles which is equivalent to 6% of the total analyzed) Ambrose Evans-Pritchard denounced the "collaboration" of ' former Premier Romano Prodi with the U.S. investment bank Goldman Sachs. This also confirms the willingness of these groups to sponsor a new political entity (perhaps the great center of Casini and Montezemolo) to arise (just as the intent of Freedom and Justice) in the center of debate raking in all that is raking the two opposing starting with Finian and a Pietristi.
The scenario is composed of very chaotic, the different interpretations, the possible implications far from obvious. While we would prefer that the political debate on the workings of government and Berlusconi's events had taken place in its natural location or in parliament, facing a strong opposition (who seems to have preferred to hide behind the reasons for publishing groups short-sighted convenience), the other the missteps of the Premier show us how really too often politics, economy and information tend to get along to the detriment not only of the quality of information but also of ordinary citizens.
Andrea Rocca, Claudio Ruggeri
0 comments:
Post a Comment