A wise Administration
task of wise Directors elected by the people is to listen, perform, assist to better manage it, take the appropriate and right decisions, being converted into concrete actions that the taxpayer pays in cash, to ensure a better future by informed choices and farsighted.
These are, in my ward, the fundamental duties of a public body, democratically elected. Duties, unfortunately, almost never fulfilled at the national level by the central government, as corruption scandals and their deaf ear to this period show with a few shadows of doubt.
E 'right to leave the difficult task of telling where the whole of Italy is moving to the more famous national press, because judging a policy so divorced from the people is the daily bread of those who are also "far away". One comment, however, the representatives closest to us, it is reasonable for the Empolitana one year after their establishment, due, perhaps, after some decisions that are setting the present and the future of San Vito, parking areas, bollards, traffic and sales of public assets.
statistics, as of 2008, speak of a fleet of cars and motorcycles in Italy of approximately 41,964,277 copies, 4,436,025 in which one region of Lazio, which are an average of 0.9 vehicles per head, counting the 44,728,480 Italians aged between 20 and 79 years.
unequivocal sign that the good land from the charming natural landscape has changed their habits, needs comfort and speed in moving to replace the legs with wheels less tiring, leading to happiness, a Fiat, for example, that 13,874,400 of its vehicles on the road had a good report from the Italian investment, but now no longer fashionable.
From the smallest scooter, going for 500 and reaching the largest SUV, they, like men, have two basic needs: food and rest, so the imperative that immediately after the fuel is the parking.
A wise administrator who comes to visit in a position to make a choice that covers the wide range of roads, should do so with these numbers in his head, in relation to the territory in which we work, putting into account that mobility is linked by a double-edged development of a country's economic and commercial realities and not living there.
I do not feel to believe that these data have filled the minds of our City Council at the time of giving birth to ideas that in recent months have re-designed the roads of San Vito.
But first things first.
1) The displacement of terminus CO.TRA.L from p.le "Fallen in Nasiriyah" in the new parking places Vallerano (largely to serve in the odor of a hypothetical future football field design in the same area, at least since the municipal technical writing) undermining the viability of a section of the main artery San Vito: viale Giovanni XXIII, to meet, perhaps, a few voters in need of tranquility.
risky choice, especially insecure, because it forces the bus to perform delicate maneuvers into and exit from the parking lot (as evidenced by visible signs along the tire tread) and came down on the edge of the forbidden for a truck, and machines illegal overtaking because of lay-bys that occupy both lanes for their near entirety.
2) The placement of bollards along one side of Viale Mario Theodoli Borgo, necessary to safeguard the bipeds have to unrealistic gymkhanas only to buy bread, but the enemy the means of locomotion because of the elimination of the second basic need of the above and threatening the weak economy of a commercial center.
If it is true that the tendency of Westerners is the lazy motor, the logical consequence is that a parking ban on wearing a likely depletion of the customers for the activities placed in the vicinity of the ban itself (and unintentionally, in our case, they have also funded). At the benefit, of course, other activities instead of a car can claim, legitimately or not (this is what must have thought our administrators when, blinded by the works of Castagneto, had an extra area with illegal parking along Viale Piave). Residents, whose garage may be counted in the palm of one hand, better not talk about it, after having bought a car without owning a box was their choice. A wise
Directors must, therefore, before the offer viable alternatives and then place the prohibitions, to educate before bashing. An example might have been the realization A car park serving the village, perhaps located in the pine forest, and unused, the front square of the 3 fountains in order to compensate for the loss of parking spaces due to the pedestrian, undoubtedly necessary and shared. A wise
Directors also had to take into account the public goods and tries to maximize profit, both economically and image, when it decides to sell.
Claiming this is not completely applicable to the recent announcement of sale of the premises of the former swimming pool (which has now become market study), capital city abandoned for several years, does not arise in which a base bid, because ' is important to discard, even on loan of use, you do not specify the destination, rather, is left to free choice of any buyer with the only constraint to be appropriate for the site, and does not even provide for a minimum bids to be submitted to the unquestionable opinion of 'judgmental entity (the directors thereof), ensuring the allocation of the race even if there is only one subject.
of quirks and flaws as if they could find other eye looking through this legal notice, but things are certainly disconcerting to want to give the eventual buyer may decide the future (behavior, it seems, changed in the last City Council) and non-removal of the prohibition of use due to landslides hydro a few decades ago that have marked the whole area, preventing in this way to assign a commercial value to what we are is unraveling.
Ironically, it may be an application for construction of a residential area, having a guarantee of future stacking and removal of the disqualification by becoming an investment virtually worthless and a commitment to low cost, a business deal for anyone who harbors completed. A wise
Directors, in addition to everything, even padroneggeria new media like the Internet, applying the necessary transparency to their public acts, making them easily available to all its constituents in detail and setting up a website accessible to all.
Part of a wise administration, however, also uses the same media to obtain information about its directors or the companies that are legally residing in its territory, avoiding a bad impression with official requests, very bizarre, and neighboring municipalities to carry out roles shyster not responsive to the institutional structure that covers.
Before the official presentation of the final municipal budget for the year 2009, this is a possible political assessment of the work of the Administration that if wise or not, will be the same voters to decide.
(Empolitana July-August 2010)
Thursday, August 12, 2010
Monday, August 9, 2010
What Can Be Done In Memory Of At A Wedding
Castagneto: 90 days after the act
More than three months since the last debate, the City Council has returned to talk about the deal Residence "Il Castagneto" why a deadline was suddenly to lie: the 60-day period , later expanded in 1990, by which the company responsible for the building would have to carry out its duties and return to the ranks of the Act (see Empolitana April 2010).
If the last time we painted the affair as "tragicomic spectacle, this time we could only call it comedy.
The City, in fact, carried in the Council, ready to act, the act of acquisition of the parking and the room below, as per previous agreements, with a small (?) procedural defect: the act, in fact, were lacking any references to what land was acquired, replaced by blanks or dots, with only some reference to an area located on Viale Piave. In fact, it was asking the Council to act on a blank check, the references would then be added afterwards. All compounded by the complete lack of technical expertise of a local about the maintenance status and legality of the work. The decision, of course, would have been unlawful and so, after several discussions, and suspension of the sitting a public vote, the text was removed from the majority and all postponed until a later date.
Naive? Ignorance? Presumption?
The adjectives that describe this move is left to the reader which, however, we can still refreshment of memory on the salient points that have remained unsolved ..
In April there was talk of recovery, albeit within the limits indicated above, to represent loading and unloading of part of the sidewalk in front of the residence, which, however, to date, there is still no tangible trace.
Also in April, also discusses the re-acquisition by the company responsible, even though they had previously sold the apartments specifically tied to tourist. Even this, again, there is no trace.
At the same time there was talk, too, the renewal of the surety to cover the building and carry insurance to protect the City approximately put the non-termination of the work to complete the new building to be dedicated to the Civil Defense. this aspect as well, however, has been dropped.
The only thing that can give reliable information is the deed of sale of land on which the parking area between the cones and the representatives of the family construction company dated June 15, 2010 and filed with the office Notary Laurora of Rome. Given this, decisions taken after the municipal resolution which feared a signed agreement for the transfer of ownership as early as three months ago.
We can not even know when this story will be closed down, so ...
See you next episode.
(Empolitana July-August 2010)
More than three months since the last debate, the City Council has returned to talk about the deal Residence "Il Castagneto" why a deadline was suddenly to lie: the 60-day period , later expanded in 1990, by which the company responsible for the building would have to carry out its duties and return to the ranks of the Act (see Empolitana April 2010).
If the last time we painted the affair as "tragicomic spectacle, this time we could only call it comedy.
The City, in fact, carried in the Council, ready to act, the act of acquisition of the parking and the room below, as per previous agreements, with a small (?) procedural defect: the act, in fact, were lacking any references to what land was acquired, replaced by blanks or dots, with only some reference to an area located on Viale Piave. In fact, it was asking the Council to act on a blank check, the references would then be added afterwards. All compounded by the complete lack of technical expertise of a local about the maintenance status and legality of the work. The decision, of course, would have been unlawful and so, after several discussions, and suspension of the sitting a public vote, the text was removed from the majority and all postponed until a later date.
Naive? Ignorance? Presumption?
The adjectives that describe this move is left to the reader which, however, we can still refreshment of memory on the salient points that have remained unsolved ..
In April there was talk of recovery, albeit within the limits indicated above, to represent loading and unloading of part of the sidewalk in front of the residence, which, however, to date, there is still no tangible trace.
Also in April, also discusses the re-acquisition by the company responsible, even though they had previously sold the apartments specifically tied to tourist. Even this, again, there is no trace.
At the same time there was talk, too, the renewal of the surety to cover the building and carry insurance to protect the City approximately put the non-termination of the work to complete the new building to be dedicated to the Civil Defense. this aspect as well, however, has been dropped.
The only thing that can give reliable information is the deed of sale of land on which the parking area between the cones and the representatives of the family construction company dated June 15, 2010 and filed with the office Notary Laurora of Rome. Given this, decisions taken after the municipal resolution which feared a signed agreement for the transfer of ownership as early as three months ago.
We can not even know when this story will be closed down, so ...
See you next episode.
(Empolitana July-August 2010)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)