On April 13, 2010 aired yet another act of the tragicomic spectacle, with dyed yellow, "the affair Castagneto the residence." To stage was not the company laugh ergo Zum the stage and not the now increasingly lonely Theatre Caesar, but the assembly room of the municipality of San Vito Romano starring the 17 representatives of our democracy, engaged in an attempt to appease their conscience in the face of an embarrassing question, now lasted too long.
This is Italian politics, starting from the lowest level: look for a stopgap that distract attention from his own and others' mistakes, as propinano happy, the end (?) Of a story that should not even begin, if all they did their duty as citizens first and foremost.
nut now, was suddenly, shockingly the problem arose, the savings of many families already invested there be a chance to come back, to show off a bit 'of rigor at all stages of our democracy seems to be missing, and so we is plugged eyes not to see how the words of those who were smiling this film had already imagined. And then we are all called to take note of how the company responsible for building "The Castagneto" implicitly acknowledges that he made mistakes and be ready to remedy the deficiencies highlighted by the Supervisory Commission, tracing back the route taken. A sterile letter in which they are expressed intentions to return (in part) between the lines of legality, read aloud by the Deputy Mayor Fiore, which illustrates:
1) the renewal of the surety insurance until 2011
2) A agreement with the family of cones sale of the land on which it was built and a public car park of the premises which were to be already attached to the heritage Municipal
3) A proposal to change the room above (for use as shelter for Civil Protection) that envisaged in the agreement because, in reality there is not even the tables
4) 3 pre-repurchase agreements of the apartments sold as a house, for instead to tourist
5) Restoration of the existing parking area in front of the pharmacy, as per original design intent
Five, these, which should bring back the former Hotel "Il Castagneto" to a state of regular (but bricks that stood out in the initial rendering of the structure where they are, for example?).
is struggling on the competence and legitimacy of any deliberation on the subject, one has to have a public presentation to share a process that could take place behind the scenes, are lost sight of the serious deficiencies and failures earlier branded as junk. You want to forget the past because now there is a case to protect human, people who have invested in the stable, you have opened or moved on a trade, those who bought a house but not live and those that will made their love nest. They are right to be defended now, they who would pay the consequences of carelessness (?) Past, ignorance of all, the attempted Morris (term used by the mayor, Ed) to the detriment of public and private sector. This can not be allowed. And so, and (o) rror become credit for almost completed a story with many dark sides, that the apology should have been a must for the change in propaganda have proved close to the victims, a survey of Judiciary is being snubbed with ostentatious calm and the sinner hailed as a benefactor, a concept carried out, moreover, also the stone of remembrance along the walls of Villa Vittorio Bachelet (which still has to be acknowledged that he converted what was only a ruin). All
strengthened by the opinion of an engineer, the municipal, that should be super-partes and that is supposed to be limited only to the more technical aspects, reduced, however, only the admission of the possibility of confiscating the entire existing building.
The happy ending, the tale turns near the end and justice (?) Has triumphed, the only solution is painless drop from the sky, the Administration has a clear conscience, even after warning letters sent to owners residential apartments, the city has lost precious money and the minority rather than attacking the substance again, stops the form, perhaps satisfied dall'esposto already submitted to the Judiciary.
But who will care to explain San Vito to why the works were not locked when there were the conditions thus avoiding the failure on which humanitarian aid is now leveraging, or who have turned instead to control the look and now instead marten individuals only for a renovation?
Who will take care to understand how three different notaries have been able to validate three deeds of sale of flats certainly not intended for residential purposes?
Who will ensure this time that the works promises are actually realized in the time and manner?
Who will compensate the people and things in recent months has been damaged by a lack of parking in front of the building?
For some of these questions is trying to answer the prosecutor's Tivoli Luca Ramacci, someone 'else will remain unanswered, but unconsciously clear publicly, and we will try to tell in the coming months, the continuation of this story, I remember well the message that shines through, so anyone (? ) with the approval of others, can groped an illegal maneuver, then having the assurance that, in case something goes wrong, it could always come back, without a shot being suffer, for now. Published in the
Empolitana (www.empolitan.org) of April 2010
0 comments:
Post a Comment